Asmus Freytag scripsit: > However, there are some unidentified characters, or ones that could be > considered missing from Unicode 4.0, or which have mappings that for one > or the other reason could be considered not ideal. These have been > highlighted. I welcome suggestions for additions to or subtractions from > this list, plus any help anyone could provide in identifying the characters > or in locating places they are used.
I strongly suspect that your various DIGRAPHS WITH BREVE BELOW are actually underties. In addition, U+F7A1 looks like a glyph variant of the glyph often used in American dictionaries to represent edh, though I have more often seen it with the stroke passing through both legs of the "h" portion. U+F776 and U+F777 are probably also American dictionary characters representing the so-called "short" and "long" sounds of English "oo", though I have more often seen them without ligaturing.
