At 16:48 -0500 2003-03-03, John Cowan wrote:
Mijan scripsit:
Let's consider the ra+virama+ya case. In the mostpart the ra+virama+ya is
displayed as ya+reph. This obviously seems to be an
instance of ambiguous interpretation because ra+virama+ya could
also represents
ra+ja-phalaa. ya+reph and ra+ja-phalaa are used in different words and have
different meaning.
I'm responding to this message in order to isolate this point. If
correct, then
the current model of YA PHALAA is inadequate.
ZWJ can be used to produce the required differentiation.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
