That looks right to me! Is that the intended use for that character? Also, I wonder what the correct thing to recommend would be? Assuming surrogate support was consistently available, and fonts were available containing this character (are there any today?), since the character was not generally being written as a single character until now (and I am still not sure if the pair U+79BE U+4E88 is the correct alternative), would it be right to recommend this for people to use in number writing going forward? I tend to think of Ext. B as there for historic and special characters, not those that might be used every day.
tex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > . > Tex Texin wrote, > > > Apparently JIS didn't have a character for jo. It looks something like the > > pair: U+79BE U+4E88. > > > > Is there a single character for jo in Unicode? > > How about U+25771 ? > > Best regards, > > James Kass > . -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com Making e-Business Work Around the World -------------------------------------------------------------
