Yes it is, except that one (tradionally puts a 'breve') over 'u' to help in differentiating; and actually, the inter-char spacing is not quite *that* regular....
K ----- Original Message ----- From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician > |> At 08:42 -0400 2003-07-15, Karljürgen Feuerherm wrote: > > >> Most German people I know can't read the German cursive script used > >> say 50 years ago. But the characters clearly correspond to the > >> Latin characters in use today. > > Is that the script where minimum comes out looking like: > > /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ > > (Ie, m => /\/\/\, n => /\/\, u => /\/\, i => /\ ?) > > NB how the i is dotless. (I can just see the [useless] debate > of whether that should then be encoded as U+0069 or U+0131. :) > > -JimC > > >
