Dear All, Can someone clarify the status of U+0BA3 TAMIL LETTER NNA and U+0BA9 TAMIL LETTER NNNA
Comparing the glyph shapes with TSCII character tables it is quite clear that U+0BA3 is NNNA and U+0BA9 is NNA. This makes also a lot of sense for non-speakers of Tamil, because it correctly correlates the number of 'N's to the number of loops in the glyph. I also got agreement from a local expert. Now I'm wondering, why is there no Unicode Erratum on this? Is it just because -for stability- character names are not allowed to change even if incorrect? Or is it an oversight? Regards, Peter Jacobi Hamburg, Germany -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++
