Peter Constable wrote: > > Alternatives given were > > (0BB8)(0BCD)(0BB1)(0BC0) > > (0BB6)(0BCD)(0BB1)(0BC0) (if and when U+0BB6 becomes Unicode) > > (0B9A)(0BBF)(0BB1)(0BC0) > > Alternatives to what? The first and third sequence would have distinct > appearances (see attached file), and would consistute distinct > spellings. The second cannot be evaluated without knowing what they > intend 0BB6 to be.
U+0BB6 = TAMIL LETTER SHA (see <http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html>). _ Marco
