This is another strawman argument isn't it? Nobody on this thread has said they want monospaced alphanumerics.
Your examples unfortunately rendered as gibberish on both of my email clients (Microsoft Outlook and Mozilla Thunderbird). If it weren't for (1) I'd ask you to repeat that in ASCII, but point (1) would make that rather a waste of time.
Jill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 3:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Hexadecimal digits?
>
>
> .
> The Math Alphabets in Plane One already include monospaced
> alphanumerics.
>
> U+ð™µð™´ð™´ð™±
> U+ðŸ·ð™³ð™´ð™°
> U+ð™±ð™°ð™±ð™´
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Philippe Verdy
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Peter Kirk
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Philippe Verdy
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Jill Ramonsky
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Philippe Verdy
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? jon
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Philippe Verdy
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Jill Ramonsky
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Kent Karlsson
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? jameskass
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Jill Ramonsky
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Michael Everson
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Carl W. Brown
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Peter Kirk
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? jameskass
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Jill Ramonsky
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Michael Everson
- RE: Hexadecimal digits? Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Philippe Verdy
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? jameskass
- Re: Hexadecimal digits? Peter Kirk

