> >This is another strawman argument isn't it? Nobody on this thread > >has said they want monospaced alphanumerics. > > No, but the responsibles have responded
My command of my native language (English) is pretty good, but the above is so ungrammatical that I don't understand it at all. I have no idea what "the responsibles" means, but if it turns out to be an implication that I am not a responsible person then that of course would be ad hominem, and I'm not a great fan of personal attacks in what should be a logical discourse.
> and informed the list that > clones of Latin letters A-F will not be entertained.
Good. Now let me be clear, AGAIN, that I don't care what the damn things look like. Consequently, *I AM AGREEING WITH YOU* on this point, and have been all along. Why is this so difficult to explain?
> How 'bout we drop the discussion?
Happy to. Stop accusing me of having opinions I don't have and I'll stop denying it.
Jill
