> Perhaps a bit off topic but while U+FE73 is made completely useless by
> modern computer font techniques and would be only found in legacy data,
> the U+2500..U+257F block may have legitimate typographycal use nowadays,
> wouldn't it?

Outside of monospaced text (which isn't really a legitimate typographical
use), you can't use it with variable length characters. So it's possible
to make limited line art with it, but unless you're showing off, illustrations
are much more useful.
-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

Search Smarter - get the new eXact Search Bar for free!
http://www.exactsearchbar.com/


Reply via email to