> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Michael Everson
> I was looking at a book on Cherokee phonetics today and 0294 was used > in lower-case text word-internally. Now that's not necessarily a > problem; PALOCHKA is also upper-case and is used word-internally. But > I thought I'd mention it. Are you saying they used a cap-height glyph word-initially and an x-height glyph elsewhere? I've got a book on phonetics with some Comanche and Shoshone data that has A, E, I, Ï and U word-medially; they would have used these word-initially if that's where the voiceless vowel came. Neither this nor a cap-height 0294 in phonetic data (in any word position) is a problem. If the general category of 0294 were changed from Ll to Lu, that Cherokee data would not be harmed in any way that I can see. (Particularly if it's printed in a book. BTW, how can something that represented digitally be in a physical book? :-) Peter Peter Constable Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies Microsoft Windows Division
