On 09/12/2003 03:41, Philippe Verdy wrote:

Peter Kirk writes:


Philippe, you have now stated this (several times). But just a day earlier you yourself stated that the rule forbidding combining marks at the start of a string would never be relaxed because it is fundamental to the XML containment model. You don't usually contradict yourself quite so obviously.



I don't know how you interpreted what I may have said a few days before.
I have certainly not said that XML forbids combining marks at the start
of XML, just that W3C does not _recommand_ it as well as any other
defective combining sequences, as they are known to cause problems
(for example when it's difficult to track the effective text file type)


So, let's get this clear. Within an XML or HTML document, if I want an e with a red acute accent on it, it is quite permissible to write:

e<span class="red-text">{U+0301}</span>

where {U+0301} is replaced by the actual Unicode character, and "red-text" is defined in the stylesheet. So it is not a problem that there is a defective combining sequence, nor that the accent is not combined with the e as it would be in NFC. Is that correct?

If this is correct, then the Tamil problem which Peter J is concerned about has gone away completely, or at least it is reduced to a tricky rendering issue.


-- Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) http://www.qaya.org/





Reply via email to