> Your alternative suggestion using svg seemed to require the user to 
> handle the details of glyph positioning with specified horizontal 
> advances, which is surely a very strange requirement. Or maybe I have 
> misunderstood what was going on here.

Perhaps so does yours. It isn't clear whether the CSS for .red-text would have 
to over-ride the default behaviour whereby an inline element like <span> is 
rendered by stacking it to the left or right (depending on text directionality) 
of the previous inline element or text node, or if the accent should go over 
the e by default.

Briefly testing on a Win2000 box I found that IE6 ignored the styling on the 
accent, Mozilla1.4 didn't show the accent, and Opera7.2 displayed the red 
accent (tests had the same results with &#x0301; as with the combining 
character used directly). It isn't clear to me which, if any, of these are 
examples of conformant behaviour.

--
Jon Hanna                   | Toys and books
<http://www.hackcraft.net/> | for hospitals:
                            | <http://santa.boards.ie/>

Reply via email to