Stefan Persson writes: > Isn't the sequence "dotless i + combining acute" canonically equivalent > to "dotted i + combining acute"?
NO. There's no canonical equivalence between distinct pairs of characters, if the first letter of each pair are not also canonically equivalent. __________________________________________________________________ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed Spam messages and set aside Newsletters for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
