----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Verdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Unicode Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:51 PM Subject: RE: Case mapping of dotless lowercase letters
> Stefan Persson writes: > > Isn't the sequence "dotless i + combining acute" canonically equivalent > > to "dotted i + combining acute"? > > NO. There's no canonical equivalence between distinct pairs of characters, > if the first letter of each pair are not also canonically equivalent. compare ÃÌ with ÄÌ The first pair has e trema as its first letter, the second pair e ogonek. Yet these pairs are canonical equivalent.
