At 15:51 -0800 2004-01-05, Peter Kirk wrote:
In Pan-Turkic, though, it looks just like CYRILLIC SOFT SIGN in all
the sources I have seen. For lots of languages.
Precisely. I meant that the glyph must be clearly distinct from
U+0062, and so should be identical to U+0446. The Pan-Turkic glyph
was probably really identical to the soft sign because printers
would have used the same type wherever possible.
We agree! We agree! We agree!
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
