From: "Kenneth Whistler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>When the combination of character name and representative glyph and associated informative annotations is insufficient to correctly identify a character in the standard, the recourse is to Ask the Experts and request further annotation of the standard to assist future users from running into the same problem.
Thanks for your view on this issue. It is far less extreme than the Michael position, which just consists in saying "informative" without more justification, when you clearly admit that they are also mandatory.
Ken and I hold the same view and have the same position. Things may be mandatory and informative, or they may be mandatory and normative.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
