> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Michael Everson
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 4:31 PM
> At 16:18 -0700 2004-04-23, Peter Constable wrote:
>
> >But let me reiterate from my correction to Philippe: even the
> >replacement of RFC 3066 is a specification for *language*
> >identification, not *locale* identification.
>
> And it is to supercede RFC 3066, with a new edition. That's different
> from replacing.
Furthermore, in the IETF document architecture, the only way to amend an RFC is by a superceding RFC. RFCs are superceded all the time.
/|/|ike
