> From: Philippe Verdy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In fact I would like to see that "Traditional" and "Simplified" Chinese > are > distinct languages in the same family. And an application would better use > "zht" > and "zhs" language codes to make the distinction, so that "zh" would > become an > identifier for a family of Han-written languages, rather than a language > identifier, and so a legacy code. In ISO 639-3, zh will be considered a macro-language identifier. But zhs and zht would not be good ideas, and will not be considered for ISO 639 or for RFC 3066. Peter Constable
