Peter Jacobi a �crit :

Patrick Andries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[on tailored collations]


[PA] I suppose this would be true in principle, but how long before this is implemented in the **actual tools** used by user such as MS Word or MS SQL Server ?
[...] (yes, I know with a bit of tailoring ($) other tools from other manufacturers could fit the bill).



When you get get it from other sources, why lamenting on the non-availability from Microsoft?



[PA] Not only Microsoft, I'm not sure that your average XML editor (XMetal, for instance) will allow this for some time (search undiscriminately a string you don't know is in Paleo-Hebrew or Square Hebrew)


There is enough software which offloads collation to IBM ICU,
where adding tailorings is very easy.


[PA] In principle yes, but this is still tailoring.




A modest contribution to the Firebird Foundation or any decent programmer working on this OSS SQL database, will give
you any collation for Firebird and Interbase.




[PA] Maybe, but I fear this is not really practical in many cases : users may already have made a technological choice and that choice often will not allow you to tailor your collation but there is already a solution that would allow to do your work (unify, tag, use a stylehsheet) and the proposed block is commercially marginal and there is little hope tools will accommodate the new block for sometime.

The argument 'we can't go this way, because Microsoft doesn't support it' is rather the wrong way around.

[PA] Well, it reflects real problems and begs the question : what do you gain with "desunification" and introducing an additional block, this introduction having a practical impact.

And it's even not
engraved in stone, that Microsoft won't support it.



[PA] This is true but this may take (some very long ?) time if the non-availabilibity Khmer or French Canadian sorting is anything to go by.

Again, I'm not opposed to Phoenician in principle (it is intellectually pleasing and cleaner), I just don't know what you gain with this encoding that you would not be able to do today (right now, with no additional cost) using what Dean Snyder proposed (XML tags and a stylesheet for rendering) especially for the large bases where Paleo-Hebrew is mixed with Square Hebrew. Not very clear to me (this may have been explained in other emails, I will read them, apologies if the pragmatic gain has been explained and I'm just appearing a bit dumb here).

Kind regards,

P. A,






Reply via email to