Michael Everson scripsit: > >Which is as much to say that R2L Ogham is illegible. But is T2B Ogham > >necessarily illegible, especially if the glyphs were to be reversed? > > Try it and see. ;-)
It's all Greek to me. -- "How they ever reached any conclusion at all [EMAIL PROTECTED]> is starkly unknowable to the human mind." http://www.reutershealth.com --"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
