Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote: > At 22:01 -0700 2004-05-02, Doug Ewell wrote: > >> Speaking of which, I'm still not happy with the silent change in the >> Unicode interpretation, introduced in version 4.0.1, of the 15924 >> code "Hrkt": >> >> Old meaning: Hiragana AND Katakana; text contains characters from >> both syllabaries. >> New meaning: Hiragana OR Katakana; text contains specific modifier >> letters that could apply to either syllabary. > > Is this an issue for the UTC or for the 15924/RA?
Probably both, depending on whose meaning is deemed to be "correct." The two clearly conflict with each other as it stands. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
