Andrew C. West wrote, > No, not at all. The charts may show consonant-vowel syllables, but that does not > mean that I believe that they should be proposed to be encoded as syllables. > > What I was saying was that all the glyphs needed for a proposal are nicely laid > out here, not that there is necessarily a one-to-one correspondence between > these glyphs and Unicode characters. >
Furthermore, Jost Gippert (the author of the Tocharian page) has long been a proponent of Unicode, has worked with other Indic scripts, and has a good understanding of Unicoding principles. What more could we ask? Best regards, James Kass
