> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Cowan
> Here's what I find: Fraser needs turned A, B, C, D, E, F, G, J, L, P, > R, T, U, V, and W; also reversed K (but I wonder if turned K is equally > recognizable). I've always assumed that they just took Latin type, ignored the lowercase, and turned some of the caps over. If that's the case, I would assume the answer is yes. > One could argue, I suppose, that Latin caps are too flexible for Fraser, > which seems to want very simple block-style glyphs But that is a typeface distinction, not a script distinction. Peter Constable
