This mail is written with the Yoruba Keyboard that was rolled out yetserday. Please just look at the issue raised earlier raised.
ÃÃáÌÃÃà ÃÃÃáÌáÌà Looking at the above it is obvious that the acute on top of the e and o with dot below is a bit too high almost to the point of looking like a cedilla under E. In transit the acute and the grave could be removed by just putting the cursor in between áÌ and áÌ because ther are combined in a way that is not binding. It even becomes a compounded problem during copying and pasting because the accent occupy two cursor space. I still think with all these observations something must be done. Dele álawále ----- Original Message ----- From: "R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 8:15 PM Subject: Re: Just if and where is the sense then? > OK, John > > how well Unicode compatible are these operating systems? > > Eudora may be obsolete, but have you got any idea how big the installed > base of Eudora is? > > groetjes, Rein > > > On Wed, 5 May 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >R.C. Bakhuizen van den Brink [Rein] scripsit: > > > >> Do low-end hardware and systems exist outside the > >> M$ Windows community? > > > >Yes. FreeBSD runs on the lowest low-end hardware you're ever likely to see > >outside a museum or a garage, and Linux is pretty good at it too. > > > >> How well does low-budget Eudora support Unicode? > > > >It doesn't, but there are much lower-budget alternatives like Mozilla > >Thunderbird that do an excellent job. Eudora is obsolete. > > > >
