> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mark E. Shoulson > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 5:47 AM
> The fact that there are people who would be > served by it indicates that Unicode should provide it. Careful, here: the fact that people would be served by it indicates that UTC should *consider* providing it. But the further consideration is whether those people can be served *without* it. If they would be served by it and cannot be well served without it, *then* we conclude that UTC should provide it. Peter Constable
