Messages by Date
-
2018/02/15
Origin of Alphasyllabaries (was: Why so much emoji nonsense?)
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? - Proscription
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations
Nelson H. F. Beebe via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Ken Whistler via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
RE: Why so much emoji nonsense? - Proscription
Shawn Steele via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations
Oren Watson via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? - Proscription
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
RE: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Shawn Steele via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Unicode of Death 2.0
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Unicode of Death 2.0
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/15
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
David Starner via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Ken Whistler via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
David Starner via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Ken Whistler via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Alastair Houghton via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Alastair Houghton via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Andrew West via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
Konstantin Ritt via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?
David Starner via Unicode
-
2018/02/14
Why so much emoji nonsense?
Erik Pedersen via Unicode
-
2018/02/13
Re: Emoji blooper
Markus Scherer via Unicode
-
2018/02/13
Re: Emoji blooper
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/02/13
Emoji blooper
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/02/11
Fwd: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now final for 2018
Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
-
2018/02/09
Cross-Locale Keyboard Features for the General Public
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/02/08
Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/08
Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/07
Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/07
Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
-
2018/02/07
Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan via Unicode
-
2018/02/07
Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/02/07
What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/05
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/01
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises - Correction
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/01
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/02/01
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
CLDR Keyboard and Layout discussion
Sarasvati via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Support for Extension F
Paul Hackett via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Support for Extension F
Tom Gewecke via Unicode
-
2018/01/31
Re: Support for Extension F
John H. Jenkins via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
David Starner via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Tom Gewecke via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Eric Muller via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Alastair Houghton via Unicode
-
2018/01/30
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Support for Extension F
via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Tom Gewecke via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/29
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/28
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Shervin Afshar via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET
Rick McGowan via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
TIRONIAN SIGN ET
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: [HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
[HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful
Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
In the mean time, in France (was Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Denis Jacquerye via Unicode
-
2018/01/27
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Julian Bradfield via Unicode
-
2018/01/26
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
John W Kennedy via Unicode
-
2018/01/26
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/26
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
2018/01/26
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/01/26
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
2018/01/25
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/25
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
2018/01/25
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/25
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/25
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/25
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andrew West via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
David Starner via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018
Markus Scherer via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
2018/01/24
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
philip chastney via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
RE: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
David Starner via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Phake Nick via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics?
philip chastney via Unicode
-
2018/01/23
Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics?
Khaled Hosny via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics?
David Melik via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Frédéric Grosshans via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
2018/01/22
SignWriting in U+40000 block
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
2018/01/21
Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
2018/01/21
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Phake Nick via Unicode
-
2018/01/21
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/21
superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics?
David Melik via Unicode
-
2018/01/21
superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics?
David Melik via Unicode
-
2018/01/21
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/20
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Simon Montagu via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Rick McGowan via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: Emoji for major planets at least?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andrew West via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andrew West via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
2018/01/19
Re: Emoji for major planets at least?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
2018/01/18
Re: Emoji for major planets at least?
Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
-
2018/01/18
Re: Emoji for major planets at least?
Aleksey Tulinov via Unicode