Michael Everson wrote at 4:01 PM on Tuesday, May 25, 2004: >At 10:12 -0400 2004-05-25, Dean Snyder wrote: > Michael Everson >> >>>In any case we're encoding the significant nodes >> >>>in your *diascript. Similarly, Swedish, Bokm�l, >> >>>Nynorsk, and Danish are distinguished, as are the >> >>>Romance languages. >> >> >> >>Are you saying that Swedish, Danish, and the >>>>Romance languages are not unified in Unicode? >>> >>>Are you being deliberately obtuse? >> >>No. > >Then go back and re-read the entire context because you have got it wrong.
I have already read it and it sounds like you're saying Romance and Scandinavian are not unified in Unicode, or as you put it "Similarly [they] are distinguished". (And the context is about significant nodes on a script continuum that should or should not be distinguished in separate encodings.) If I am misunderstanding you, could you please make it clearer what you intend? Respectfully, Dean A. Snyder Assistant Research Scholar Manager, Digital Hammurabi Project Computer Science Department Whiting School of Engineering 218C New Engineering Building 3400 North Charles Street Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21218 office: 410 516-6850 cell: 717 817-4897 www.jhu.edu/digitalhammurabi
