Messages by Thread
-
-
Emoji blooper
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Fwd: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now final for 2018
Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
-
Cross-Locale Keyboard Features for the General Public
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
CLDR Keyboard and Layout discussion
Sarasvati via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Tom Gewecke via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Eric Muller via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Alastair Houghton via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Tom Gewecke via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
David Starner via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Support for Extension F
via Unicode
-
Re: Support for Extension F
John H. Jenkins via Unicode
-
Re: Support for Extension F
Tom Gewecke via Unicode
-
Re: Support for Extension F
Paul Hackett via Unicode
-
Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
TIRONIAN SIGN ET
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
-
[HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful
Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
-
Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
SignWriting in U+40000 block
Doug Ewell via Unicode
-
superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics?
David Melik via Unicode
-
Emoji for major planets at least?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Observations and rants
Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
-
0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Eric Muller via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Pravin Jain via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andrew West via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andrew West via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Rick McGowan via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Simon Montagu via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Phake Nick via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
David Starner via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Phake Nick via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andrew West via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
John W Kennedy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Julian Bradfield via Unicode
-
In the mean time, in France (was Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Denis Jacquerye via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Andre Schappo via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Garth Wallace via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Anshuman Pandey via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Robert Wheelock via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Robert Wheelock via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Khaled Hosny via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
John W Kennedy via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
David Starner via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
-
Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
-
Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
-
Re: Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
-
Re: Coloured Characters
William_J_G Overington via Unicode
-
Re: Coloured Characters
Richard Wordingham via Unicode