Who, exactly, was supposed to have done the ignoring? And when? This sounds like a piece of gossip -- I still hear no facts.
For all we know, Alan spoke to his cousin Lenny, whose friend Bubba had a sister Emma who worked at the factory for Unicoat (Airplane Coating Systems) in Atlanta, and said her boss wasn't interested in Hebrew. Mark __________________________________ http://www.macchiato.com â ààààààààààààààààààààà â ----- Original Message ----- From: "E. Keown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue, 2004 May 25 10:51 Subject: Re: Response to Everson Ph and why Jun 7? fervor > Elaine Keown > Tucson > > Dear Mark Davis: > > The events in question happened in the Very Archaic > Unicode Era (1987-88), before 'document repositories' > etc, were invented. > > At that point, I understand you were still > communicating in paper or clay, as needed..... > > Right now one of the board members of ANSI (William > Kelly) and also Debbie Anderson are trying to make > sure there is communication between Unicode/ISO and > the scholarly world... > > But in the Very Archaic Unicode Era, apparently no one > was doing this. > > I just wrote 2 preliminary proposals (Babylonian > Pointing, Samaritan pointing), and McGowan/Ksar gave > me document numbers. I hope to write 2 more proposals > in the next two weeks. The font will not be done > until July. > > These four proposals are basic groundwork for later > proposals (Hebrew collation, a subject already > relished by the list), since they should complete > 90-something-% of "Extended Hebrew." > > Elaine Keown > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. > http://messenger.yahoo.com/ > >
