> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of James Kass
> > Not sure what you are saying here or what you mean by the inside-out > rule. > > The two sequences are canonically equivalent and should look identical. > > The "inside-out" rule is explained and illustrated on page 125 (TUS 4.0). > > An "a" followed by combining umlaut followed by combining macron > is not the same as "a" plus combining macron plus combining umlaut. That rule applies to combining marks in the *same* canonical combining class. In this case, they are in different classes. Peter Constable
