On 11/06/2004 10:51, James Kass wrote:
...
Doesn't this mean that it isn't possible to stack a combining circumflex
above a combining spanning inverted breve? Does this mean we'd need double-wide clones of all the combining marks in order to support such
combos?
Sounds like the same problem we found with Hebrew nearly a year ago, and solved by inserting CGJ to keep the non-canonical order which we needed. Perhaps this is another suitable application for CGJ.
-- Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) http://www.qaya.org/
