Christopher Fynn wrote: > Is there any plan to include sets of shorthand (Pitman, Gregg etc.) > symbols in Unicode? Or are they something which is specifically excluded?
They're a form of handwriting, which is generally excluded. Why do they need to be encoded in a computer? General practice, at least, is to transcribe them into standard writing first. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
