"fantasai" <fantasai dot lists at inkedblade dot net> wrote:
>> My recommendations would be to: >> >> (1) Use XHTML > > Unless you're sending with a proper XHTML mimetype, you should be > using HTML 4.01 Strict. > > http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml Much of this document revolves around the point that XHTML authors tend not to run their work through a validator, which then tends to contain undetected errors that lead to structural and portability problems, and if you are one of the VERY FEW who run your code through a validator then this probably doesn't apply to you. This is a validation problem, not an "XHTML is broken" problem. If anyone has trouble reading my all-XHTML, all-validated pages, using any reasonably modern browser, please let me know off-list. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
