On 18 Sep 2010, at 20:23, Asmus Freytag wrote: > Why not use the character that was added to Unicode precisely for the purpose?
Seems like that character needs an annotation, doesn't it? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
On 18 Sep 2010, at 20:23, Asmus Freytag wrote: > Why not use the character that was added to Unicode precisely for the purpose?
Seems like that character needs an annotation, doesn't it? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/