Karl Pentzlin <karl dash pentzlin at acssoft dot de> wrote: > Then, it seems appropriate to consider it is a script separate from > Latin, like Lisu http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/UA4D0.pdf . > Otherwise, we end up with a number of uppercase Latin letters > with no lowercase counterpart. This would be a problem due to > Unicode stability policies, which do not allow to encode a lowercase > counterpart later for an already encoded uppercase letter.
Assuming that there is a use case to encode Unifon at all, I take this to mean that encoding the missing (uppercase) Unifon letters as Latin might trigger a defensive reaction to encode unattested or newly invented lowercase equivalents. I hope this is not the effect that the stability policy is having. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell
