Karl Pentzlin: > Attached is a Unifon chart as used for Hupa, according to > http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED286691.pdf , p. 12.
That’s it? Looks like diacritics to me, combined with some typographic preferences and a changed collation sequence perhaps. a/A with preferred typographic uppercase rendering akin Delta Δ b/B c/C ɔ/Ɔ 0254/0186 d/D e/E i/I j/J g/G h/H i̵/I̵ +0335, with typographic preference for vertical serifs on the bar i̯/I̯ +032F, or mandatory ai/AI digraph ligature, e.g. aͥ/Aͥ (+0365) k/K l/L m/M n/N o/O o̲/O̲ +0332 o⃒/O⃒ +20D2, or ø/Ø with typographic preference for vertical line o⃓/O⃓ +20D3, or q/Q or mandatory ao/AO(?) digraph ligature ƣ/Ƣ 01A3/01A2, or mandatory oi/OI digraph ligature, e.g. oͥ/Oͥ (+0365) ŋ/Ŋ 014B/014A, or new letter Latin Capital Letter Reversed N s/S t/T u/U ū/Ū 016B/016A, or ū/Ū (+0304) w/W y/Y / not sure whether H-based, O-based or neither x/X z/Z or ƶ/Ƶ (01B6/01B5) x̄/X̄ +0304 In conclusion, most of this should probably be handled at the (smart) font level.
