On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 20:56, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorp...@cs.tut.fi> wrote: > > > I may have missed some parts of the discussion, but I don’t see why you > couldn’t just use the zero-width non-joiner. Using it may cause risks of its > own, but at least you would be dealing with risks related to the original > problem. > > Jukka > > I would also think that ZWNJ is more safe and appropriate than CGJ.
Szabolcs
