On 08/20/2011 10:54 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On 08/19/2011 10:05 PM, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
All of the property assignments to PUA characters (except the GC) are
purely informative.
I just now noticed that you had excepted the GC in the above. Why is
that? How are applications supposed to handle combining marks etc if in
the PUA?
Mark, can you please reply to the above --
It seems that while it is true that GC=Co should be retained *in the
standard* to clearly identify the character as a PUA character, the
applications will still by changing that GC to Lo, Mc, Mn, No etc for
their internal private-agreement processing. So what is the exact nature
of your excepting the GC in your statement above?
--
Shriramana Sharma
