On 10/13/2011 09:47 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
I'd like to have an opinion about why this chart (for example) describes two code points 09E4 and 09E5 as<reserved>, without assigning any glyph, but still associating them with other punctuation signs in another script. Are these positions permanently reserved for the case where specific danda signs would be later discovered and encoded specifically in this script ? OR are they really unassigned and usable for encoding later any other kind of character ?
They are for potential script-specific danda signs and closed to other kinds of characters.
-- Shriramana Sharma
