imaginablePeter Cyrus <pcyrus at alivox dot net> wrote: > I think we'll all need for a long time more to write text that displays > adequately as plain text in the absence of even OpenType advancexd typography > features.
s/OpenType/rich-text/ or maybe s/OpenType/fancy-text/ "Rich text" is not defined by what has been, or can be, done with OpenType. OpenType is an excellent and very widely used font standard, but it is not the only imaginable one. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell
