So what do you propose ? - Encoding the new precomposed pairs as a new combining character (there may be a lot of candidate pairs to encode, espacially in the Latin script), - or encoding a variation of the existing diacritic to mean that they are bound to a first-level of diacritic (here a combining letter), - or duplicating the encoding of the diacritics without using varation selectors ? - or using an upper layer protocol ?
Le 5 mars 2012 20:09, Michael Everson <[email protected]> a écrit : > On 5 Mar 2012, at 18:48, Denis Jacquerye wrote: > >> My question really is whether they could not be seen as >> <comb>a<comb><comb>diaeresis</comb>, etc. Where the shape of >> <comb>diaeresis</comb> is contextual. > > No, because both the combining-a and the combining-diaeresis are bound to the > base letter; the combining diaeresis is not bound to the combining-a. > > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ > > >
