On 3/5/2012 2:01 PM, Denis Jacquerye wrote:
Wouldn't CGJ be useful in some way in cases like that of the cedilla or the light centralization stroke 1AB9 ? "Base character + combining letter + CGJ + combining cedilla" would be clear, the cedilla would not be moved.
How is that simpler than "Base character + combining-c-cedilla" ? --which is what the
users want. Trying to introduce recursion of decomposition into these kinds of combining marks just creates a mess, IMO.
1DEC is not based on a character that itself is decomposable, at least the way things are, so it's not on topic.
Actually, c-cedilla *is* decomposable, which is precisely why it *is* on topic.
See U+00E7, which has a canonical decomposition mapping. --Ken
