On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:32:09 -0700 David Starner <prosfil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The proposal seems trivial, except for the > minor problem of establishing sufficient use to justify encoding. If they are to be adopted by the CLDR, the digits need to be coded consecutively. However, the symbols for '5', '10' and '15' do invite interpretation as combining diacritics. Decompositions would have to be encoded from the very beginning - they cannot be added in a later standard. Richard.
