On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Ken Whistler <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see any necessary correlation between what sequences > people might end up insisting on naming (for whatever reason) and what > people might consider to be "graphemes".
I submit that the following sequence shall be allotted named sequence status: \u0053\u0048\u0052\u0049\u0052\u0041\u004D\u0041\u004E\u0041 ;-) -- Shriramana Sharma
