On 21 Jun 2012, at 04:09, Shriramana Sharma wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Ken Whistler <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't see any necessary correlation between what sequences >> people might end up insisting on naming (for whatever reason) and what >> people might consider to be "graphemes". > > I submit that the following sequence shall be allotted named sequence status: > > \u0053\u0048\u0052\u0049\u0052\u0041\u004D\u0041\u004E\u0041
I don't know. Someone will be along looking for a title-cased form. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
