|
Here's my *updated* summary of the annotations that we've been
discussing so far:
(the reference to en-dash is based on the Italian usage cited in
the Wikipedia article for Obelus) [for background documentation for the above passage see:
http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2012-m07/0134.html]
For mathematical use, the use of the mathematical |
Title: HTML clipboard
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIV... Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIV... Hans Aberg
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIV... Leif Halvard Silli
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIV... Mark E. Shoulson
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIV... Doug Ewell
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & ... Richard Wordingham
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON Joó Ádám
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLO... Asmus Freytag
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON Christoph Päper
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLO... Asmus Freytag
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLON Asmus Freytag
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLO... Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & ... Michael Everson
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN &a... Philippe Verdy
- Re: Too narrowly defined: DIVISION SIGN & COLO... Hans Aberg

