On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Naena Guru <[email protected]> wrote: >There, my challenge stands 1. to show where I hurt Singhala by > romanizing. 2. to show how romanized Singhala violates any standard in what > specific way. > 3. to show that romanized Singhala is inferior to Unicode Singhala in some > unique way that no other implementation of a language on the computer > displays.
I read all your posts in your font. Unfortunately, I don't read Singhala, so I don't know what you said. Unfortunately, your system offers no universally understood plain text way of stating whether the text should be read in a Singhala font or a Latin font, so even if you do send English text, I will still probably be unable to read it. You can rest assured that my text is Unicode-conformant, so sufficient information to display it is encoded in the plain text. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.
