RE: UTC Document Register Now Public

[William_J_G Overington]

On Friday 19 April 2013, Whistler, Ken <ken.whist...@sap.com> wrote:
   
> It is quite unlikely that such a document would be rejected on procedural 
> grounds, just because it was making an argument for a change of scope, rather 
> than being a proposal that was already clearly in scope. (I assume that is 
> what you are asking here.)
  
Thank you for your reply.
 
Yes, that was what I was asking.
 
Thank you for a precise and helpful answer.
 
William Overington
 
20 April 2013