On 5/29/2013 9:38 AM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Asmus Freytag <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:In the case you give, the "new" design is clearly not the canonical shape, because it deliberately innovates. If it ever replaces the other sign in a majority of uses (not just in NYC) then perhaps updating the glyph might be appropriate. At this time, we are far from that point.That we are far from that point is clear to me; I was asking if there is a (semi-)formal definition of that point. What is "a majority of uses"?
I think Michael's answer covered that. A./
