On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:36:16 +0100 Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2013, at 13:41, Denis Jacquerye <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we don't want additional confusing characters maybe we should > > have CGJ, ZWJ or ZWNJ + combining cedilla (or any other similar > > sequence) to optionally differentiate the types of cedillas in > > Latvian, Livonian, Marshallese and romanizations. > > We can't really use these with combining diacritical marks. It does remind me of the distinction between German umlaut marks and diaereses, for which CGJ was the solution. There's a similar problem with the distinction in dictionaries between Nenets U+0438 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER I plus combining breve to shorten it and the Nenets use of the semivowel U+0439 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHORT I. Richard.
